[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061222144134.GH31882@telegraafnet.nl>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:41:34 +0100
From: Ard -kwaak- van Breemen <ard@...egraafnet.nl>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin.zhang@...el.com>,
Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@...puserve.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@....com>, take@...ero.it,
agalanin@...a.ru, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [Bug 7505] Linux-2.6.18 fails to boot on AMD64 machine
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 12:30:29AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> To whom do I have to pay how much to get this darn patch tested?
I've altered your patch to do the spin_lock_irqsave in down_read.
I am very ignorant and stupid. That's why I am doing it without
thinking why or why not de irqsave is ok in that region or not.
And the results are:
include/asm-i386/ide.h ide_default_io_base(): blaat: interrupts were disabled@49
include/asm-i386/ide.h ide_default_io_base(): blaat: interrupts were disabled@51
include/asm-i386/ide.h ide_default_io_base(): blaat: interrupts were disabled@59
Meaning: it works.
Repeating: I am very stupid, so I don't know if saving the irq state is ok or
not in down_read.
--
program signature;
begin { telegraaf.com
} writeln("<ard@...egraafnet.nl> TEM2");
end
.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists