[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612221004030.18171@xanadu.home>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 10:05:59 -0500 (EST)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@....org>
To: pHilipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Victor <andrew@...people.com>,
Bill Gatliff <bgat@...lgatliff.com>,
Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>, jamey.hicks@...com,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...sta.com>,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc1 5/6] SA1100 GPIO wrappers
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, pHilipp Zabel wrote:
> On 12/21/06, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:13:21 -0800
> > David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net> wrote:
> >
> > > +#define gpio_get_value(gpio) \
> > > + (GPLR & GPIO_GPIO(gpio))
> > > +
> > > +#define gpio_set_value(gpio,value) \
> > > + ((value) ? (GPSR = GPIO_GPIO(gpio)) : (GPCR(gpio) =
> > > GPIO_GPIO(gpio)))
> >
> > likewise.
>
> I have done the same to the SA1100 wrappers as to the PXA wrappers now.
> Maybe the non-inline functions in generic.c are overkill for those much
> simpler
> macros on SA...
I think the SA1x00 has no advantage of having out of line versions. The
function call will cost more than the inline version even if gpio is not
constant.
Nicolas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists