linux-kernel - Re: two architectures,same source tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E1GxrGg-0001SL-3h@be1.lrz>
Date:	Fri, 22 Dec 2006 21:45:26 +0100
From:	Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de>
To:	Jörn Engel <joern@...ybastard.org>,
	Yakov Lerner <iler.ml@...il.com>,
	Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: two architectures,same source tree

Jörn Engel <joern@...ybastard.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 December 2006 20:32:20 +0200, Yakov Lerner wrote:

>> Is it easily possible to build two architectures in
>> the same source tree (so that intermediate fles
>> and resut files do not interfere ) ?
> 
> I'd try something like this:
> make O=../foo ARCH=foo
> make O=../bar ARCH=bar
> 
> But as I'm lazy I'll leave the debugging to you. :)

IIRC You'll have to specify ARCH= on each make call, but O= is saved in
../foo/Makefile.
-- 
Ich danke GMX dafür, die Verwendung meiner Adressen mittels per SPF
verbreiteten Lügen zu sabotieren.

http://david.woodhou.se/why-not-spf.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/