[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <652016d30612212156g604d0d15y7fbd27c01e2aab1e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 11:41:47 +0545
From: "Manish Regmi" <regmi.manish@...il.com>
To: "Bhanu Kalyan Chetlapalli" <chbhanukalyan@...il.com>
Cc: kernelnewbies@...linux.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux disk performance.
On 12/22/06, Bhanu Kalyan Chetlapalli <chbhanukalyan@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the suggestion but the performance was terrible when write
> > cache was disabled.
>
> Performance degradation is expected. But the point is - did the
> anomaly, that you have pointed out, go away? Because if it did, then
> it is the disk cache which is causing the issue, and you will have to
> live with it. Else you will have to look elsewhere.
oops, sorry for incomplete answer.
Actually i did not tested thoroughly but my initial tests showed some
bumps and serious performance degradation. But anyway there was still
some bumps... :(
(sequence)(channel)(write time in microseconds)
0 0 6366
0 1 9949
0 2 10125
0 3 10165
0 4 11043
0 5 10129
0 6 10089
0 7 10165
0 8 71572
0 9 9882
0 10 8105
0 11 10085
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
regards
Manish Regmi
---------------------------------------------------------------
UNIX without a C Compiler is like eating Spaghetti with your mouth
sewn shut. It just doesn't make sense.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists