[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <458C9BB2.1060201@cybsft.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 21:00:02 -0600
From: "K.R. Foley" <kr@...sft.com>
To: "Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>
CC: mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rt14 slowdown compared to 2.6.19
Chen, Tim C wrote:
> Ingo,
>
> We did some benchmarking on 2.6.19-rt14, compared it with 2.6.19
> kernel and noticed several slowdowns. The test machine is a 2 socket
> woodcrest machine with your default configuration.
>
> Netperf TCP Streaming was slower by 40% ( 1 server and 1 client
> each bound to separate cpu cores on different socket, network
> loopback mode was used).
>
> Volanomark was slower by 80% (Server and Clients communicate with
> network loopback mode. Idle time goes from 1% to 60%)
>
> Re-Aim7 was slower by 40% (idle time goes from 0% to 20%)
>
> Wonder if you have any suggestions on what could cause the slowdown.
> We've tried disabling CONFIG_NO_HZ and it didn't help much.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Tim
Take a look at this. Not sure if this is the same problem but it looks
like a candidate. I can definitely say that some latencies I have seen
in my recent testing have gone away in the last few versions
2.6.20-rc1-rt{3,4}.
Sorry I missed the URL first time around.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=116670388527349&w=2
--
kr
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists