[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061223232915.GA2763@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 00:29:15 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Siddha@...e.hu, Suresh B <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] suspend: fix suspend on single-CPU systems
> Subject: [patch] suspend: fix suspend on single-CPU systems
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
>
> Clark Williams reported that suspend doesnt work on his laptop on
> 2.6.20-rc1-rt kernels. The bug was introduced by the following cleanup
> commit:
>
> commit 112cecb2cc0e7341db92281ba04b26c41bb8146d
> Author: Siddha, Suresh B <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
> Date: Wed Dec 6 20:34:31 2006 -0800
>
> [PATCH] suspend: don't change cpus_allowed for task initiating the suspend
>
> because with this change 'error' is not initialized to 0 anymore, if
> there are no other online CPUs. (i.e. if the system is single-CPU).
>
> the fix is the initialize it to 0. The really weird thing is that my
> version of gcc does not warn about this non-initialized variable
> situation ...
>
> (also fix the kernel printk in the error branch, it was missing a
> newline)
>
> Reported-by: Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Looks okay to me.
--
Thanks, Sharp!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists