[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87psa9z0wu.fsf@duaron.myhome.or.jp>
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 01:58:09 +0900
From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
To: "Fabio Comolli" <fabio.comolli@...il.com>
Cc: "kernel list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: scheduling while atomic - Linux 2.6.20-rc2-ga3d89517
"Fabio Comolli" <fabio.comolli@...il.com> writes:
> Just found this in syslog. It was during normal activity, about 6
> minutes after resume-from-ram. I never saw this before.
It seems someone missed to check PREEMPT_ACTIVE in __resched_legal().
Could you please test the following patch?
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
---
kernel/sched.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -puN kernel/sched.c~__resched_legal kernel/sched.c
--- linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c~__resched_legal 2006-12-24 22:40:19.000000000 +0900
+++ linux-2.6-hirofumi/kernel/sched.c 2006-12-24 23:54:01.000000000 +0900
@@ -4619,10 +4619,11 @@ asmlinkage long sys_sched_yield(void)
static inline int __resched_legal(int expected_preempt_count)
{
-#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
+#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT
+ expected_preempt_count = 0;
+#endif
if (unlikely(preempt_count() != expected_preempt_count))
return 0;
-#endif
if (unlikely(system_state != SYSTEM_RUNNING))
return 0;
return 1;
_
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists