| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20061226112040.95091.qmail@web32614.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 03:20:40 -0800 (PST) From: Martin Knoblauch <knobi@...bisoft.de> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Binary Drivers On 12/25/06, David Schwartz <davids@...xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If I bought the car from the manufacturer, it also must > include any rights the manufacturer might have to the car's use. > That includes using the car to violate emission control measures. > If I didn't buy the right to use the car that way (insofar as > that right was owned by the car manufacturer), I didn't > buy the whole care -- just *some* of the rights to use it. just to be dense - what makes you think that the car manufacturer has any legal right to violate emission control measures? What an utter nonsense (sorry). So, lets stop the stupid car comparisons. They are no being funny any more. Martin ------------------------------------------------------ Martin Knoblauch email: k n o b i AT knobisoft DOT de www: http://www.knobisoft.de - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists