linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6] containers: BeanCounters over generic process containers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 25 Dec 2006 16:54:13 -0800
From:	"Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
To:	"Kirill Korotaev" <dev@...ru>
Cc:	"Herbert Poetzl" <herbert@...hfloor.at>, akpm@...l.org, pj@....com,
	sekharan@...ibm.com, xemul@...ru, serue@...ibm.com,
	vatsa@...ibm.com, rohitseth@...gle.com, winget@...gle.com,
	containers@...ts.osdl.org, ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] containers: BeanCounters over generic process containers

On 12/25/06, Kirill Korotaev <dev@...ru> wrote:
> > also note that certain limits are much more
> > complicated than the (very simple) file limits
> > and the code will be called at higher frequency
> Agree with this. This patch doesn't prove that BCs can be integrated to the
> containers infrastructure.

What concerns do you have in particular? Are there any changes that
you'd like to see?

Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/