linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] Heads up on a series of AIO patchsets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 27 Dec 2006 18:18:54 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	linux-aio@...ck.org, akpm@...l.org, drepper@...hat.com,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	jakub@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Heads up on a series of AIO patchsets


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:

> >     unified event system for Linux we need people to help out with 
> >     straightening out these even provides as Evgeny seems to be 
> >     unwilling/unable to do the work himself and the duplication is 
> >     simply not acceptable.
> 
> yeah. The internal machinery should be as unified as possible - but 
> different sets of APIs can be offered, to make it easy for people to 
> extend their existing apps in the most straightforward way.

just to expand on this: i dont think this should be an impediment to the 
POSIX AIO patches. We should get some movement into this and should give 
the capability to glibc and applications. Kernel-internal unification is 
something we are pretty good at doing after the fact. (and if any of the 
APIs dies or gets very uncommon we know in which direction to unify)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/