[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200612271935.07835.vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 19:35:07 +0100
From: Denis Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
To: ray-gmail@...rabbit.org
Cc: "Rob Landley" <rob@...dley.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David McCullough" <david_mccullough@...securecomputing.com>
Subject: Re: Feature request: exec self for NOMMU.
On Wednesday 27 December 2006 06:13, Ray Lee wrote:
> On 12/26/06, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net> wrote:
> > I'm trying to make some nommu-friendly busybox-like tools, which means using
> > vfork() instead of fork(). This means that after I fork I have to exec in
> > the child to unblock the parent, and if I want to exec my current executable
> > I have to find out where it lives so I can feed the path to exec(). This is
> > nontrivial.
> >
> > Worse, it's not always possible. If chroot() has happened since the program
> > started, there may not _be_ a path to my current executable available from
> > this process's current or root directories.
>
> How about openning an fd to yourself at the beginning of execution, then calling
> fexecve later?
This solves chroot problem. How to find path-to-yourself reliably
(for one, without using /proc/self/exe) is not obvious to me.
--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists