[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061227135624.GP17561@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 13:56:24 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...nvz.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: Racy /proc creations interfaces
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 04:42:23PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>
> struct proc_entry_raw foo_pe_raw = {
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> .name = "foo",
> .mode = 0644,
> .read_proc = foo_read_proc,
> .data = foo_data,
> .parent = foo_parent,
> };
>
> pde = create_proc_entry(&foo_pe_raw);
> if (!pde)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> where "struct proc_entry_raw" is cut down version of "struct proc_dir_entry"
Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwww
Please, please no. Especially not .parent. If anything, let's add a
helper saying "it's all set up now". And turn create_proc_entry()
into a macro that would pass THIS_MODULE to underlying function and
call that helper, so that simple cases wouldn't have to bother at all.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists