[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4593C051.2020400@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 08:02:09 -0500
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
To: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nfs@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
Subject: Re: [NFS] VFS: Busy inodes after unmount. Self-destruct in 5 seconds.
Have a nice day...
Jesper Juhl wrote:
> I get this message in my webservers (with NFS mounted homedirs) logs once
> in a while :
>
> kernel: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount. Self-destruct in 5 seconds. Have a nice day...
>
> It doesn't seem to have any bad effect on anything, but it would be nice
> to know if there is any cause for concern.
>
It is cause for concern. This means that the filesystem was unmounted (and the
superblock was freed), but the inode structs are still hanging around. The
"self-destruct" is telling you that eventually, this machine will crash due to
this. If you see this message you should probably plan a reboot sometime.
What will happen is that eventually the kernel may try to reference these
inodes, but they now have pointers into a freed superblock. If that superblock
memory was reused for another purpose, you'll likely crash.
IMO, we should probably consider this to be a BUG(), but that only really is
helpful if you can capture a coredump and can try to track down why these inodes
couldn't be flushed correctly. In the very least, it's probably time to change
this message to be less cryptic.
I've seen some sporadic reports of this problem on earlier kernels in situations
where a NFS server is unable to be contacted for a while, but have not gotten
enough info to get a handle on it.
-- Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists