linux-kernel - Re: open /dev/kvm: No such file or directory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4593E7EB.7070801@argo.co.il>
Date:	Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:51:07 +0200
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...o.co.il>
To:	Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com>
CC:	Dor Laor <dor.laor@...ranet.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: open /dev/kvm: No such file or directory

Jeff Chua wrote:
> On 12/28/06, Avi Kivity <avi@...o.co.il> wrote:
>
>> udev is the best solution here.  It works with read-only root as it
>> mounts tmpfs on /dev.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion and I'll look into it. As for now, my system
> works well without udev, and I just wanted to test kvm without the
> "dynamic" /dev/kvm feature if possible.
>
> Would it be possible to create /dev/kvm once and let it stay there
> permanently? How about a switch for non-udev system?

[cc'ing udev guru]

Greg, /dev/kvm is a MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR device.  Is there any way of 
using it without udev?  Should I allocate a static number?


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/