linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] remove 556 unneeded #includes of sched.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0612282154460.20531@gockel.physik3.uni-rostock.de>
Date:	Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:58:17 +0100 (CET)
From:	Tim Schmielau <tim@...sik3.uni-rostock.de>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove 556 unneeded #includes of sched.h

On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:27:40 +0100 (CET)
> Tim Schmielau <tim@...sik3.uni-rostock.de> wrote:
> 
> > After Al Viro (finally) succeeded in removing the sched.h #include in 
> > module.h recently, it makes sense again to remove other superfluous 
> > sched.h includes.
> 
> Why are they "superfluous"?  Because those compilation
> units pick up sched.h indirectly, via other includes?
> 
> If so, is that a thing we want to do?

No, there is nothing at all in these files that needs sched.h. I suppose 
the includes are left over from times when more unrelated macros lived in 
sched.h (fortunately much of that cruft got cleand up already).

Tim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/