linux-kernel - [patch] x86: Fix dev_to_node for x86 and x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20061228210553.GA3874@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Thu, 28 Dec 2006 13:05:53 -0800
From:	Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...e.de, jgarzik@...ox.com,
	hch@....de
Subject: [patch] x86: Fix dev_to_node  for x86 and x86_64

Hi Andrew,
dev_to_node() does not work as expected on x86 and x86_64 as pointed out
earlier here:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/11/7/10

Following patch fixes it, please apply.  (Note: The fix depends on support
for PCI domains for x86/x86_64)

Thanks,
Kiran


dev_to_node does not work as expected on x86_64 (and i386).  This is because
node value returned by pcibus_to_node is initialized after a struct device
is created with current x86_64 code.

We need the node value initialized before the call to pci_scan_bus_parented,
as the generic devices are allocated and initialized
off pci_scan_child_bus, which gets called from pci_scan_bus_parented
The following patch does that using "pci_sysdata" introduced by the PCI
domain patches in -mm.

Signed-off-by: Alok N Kataria <alok.kataria@...softinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Ravikiran Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org>
Signed-off-by: Shai Fultheim <shai@...lex86.org>

Index: linux-2.6.20-rc1/arch/i386/pci/acpi.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.20-rc1.orig/arch/i386/pci/acpi.c	2006-12-28 11:51:52.542775000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.20-rc1/arch/i386/pci/acpi.c	2006-12-28 12:01:19.242775000 -0800
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ struct pci_bus * __devinit pci_acpi_scan
 {
 	struct pci_bus *bus;
 	struct pci_sysdata *sd;
+	int pxm;
 
 	/* Allocate per-root-bus (not per bus) arch-specific data.
 	 * TODO: leak; this memory is never freed.
@@ -30,15 +31,21 @@ struct pci_bus * __devinit pci_acpi_scan
 	}
 #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS */
 
+	sd->node = -1;
+
+	pxm = acpi_get_pxm(device->handle);
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
+	if (pxm >= 0)
+		sd->node = pxm_to_node(pxm);
+#endif
+
 	bus = pci_scan_bus_parented(NULL, busnum, &pci_root_ops, sd);
 	if (!bus)
 		kfree(sd);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
 	if (bus != NULL) {
-		int pxm = acpi_get_pxm(device->handle);
 		if (pxm >= 0) {
-			sd->node = pxm_to_node(pxm);
 			printk("bus %d -> pxm %d -> node %d\n",
 				busnum, pxm, sd->node);
 		}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/