linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] remove 556 unneeded #includes of sched.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0612282203580.20531@gockel.physik3.uni-rostock.de>
Date:	Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:10:20 +0100 (CET)
From:	Tim Schmielau <tim@...sik3.uni-rostock.de>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove 556 unneeded #includes of sched.h

On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, Randy Dunlap wrote:

> I'm half done with a patch to remove includes of smp_lock.h.
> For the files that I have patched, I checked each source file
> for all interfaces in smp_lock.h to verify that none of them
> are used, so the #include is just waste.

Yes, that's what I also did. And then I checked for all interfaces in all 
headers included indirectly through sched.h and not already included in 
the respective source file to see whether any of these includes are needed 
to keep the file compilable (although this time, amazingly few includes 
had to be added back - only 5 for all 556)

Maybe I should have taken a look at my original patch descripions from 
last year, I admit the current one isn't very illuminating.

Tim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/