linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] remove 556 unneeded #includes of sched.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0612282251560.6944@gockel.physik3.uni-rostock.de>
Date:	Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:53:44 +0100 (CET)
From:	Tim Schmielau <tim@...sik3.uni-rostock.de>
To:	Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
cc:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove 556 unneeded #includes of sched.h

On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, Russell King wrote:

> Given that it takes about 8 to 12 hours to do a build cycle, that's

My build cycle takes about 2 hours for 4 configs, on a decent AMD64 
system (running completely in tmpfs). Am I doing something wrong or are 
you talking about native builds?

Tim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/