[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061228.143815.41633302.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 14:38:15 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: torvalds@...l.org
Cc: akpm@...l.org, guichaz@...oo.fr, ranma@...edrich.de,
gordonfarquharson@...il.com, tbm@...ius.com,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, andrei.popa@...eo.ro, hugh@...itas.com,
nickpiggin@...oo.com.au, arjan@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kenneth.w.chen@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix page_mkclean_one
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 12:14:31 -0800 (PST)
> I get corruption - but the whole point is that it's very much pdflush that
> should be writing these pages out.
I think what might be happening is that pdflush writes them out fine,
however we don't trap writes by the application _during_ that writeout.
These corruptions look exactly as if:
1) pdflush begins writeback of page X
2) page goes to disk
3) application writes a chunk to the page
4) pdflush et al. think the page is clean, so it gets tossed, losing
the writes done in #3
So there's a missing PTE change in there, so that we never get proper
re-dirtying of the page if the application tries to write to the page
during the writeback.
It's something that will only occur with writeback and MAP_SHARED
writable access to the file pages. That's why we never see this
with normal filesystem writes, since those explicitly manage the
page dirty state.
I think the dirty balancing logic etc. isn't where the problems are,
to me it's a PTE state update issue for sure.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists