[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9e4733910612281443t53a1bbd8n97bbb35651cf6929@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:43:48 -0500
From: "Jon Smirl" <jonsmirl@...il.com>
To: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: "Randy Dunlap" <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: scheduling while atomic, new libata code
On 12/28/06, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Thursday 28 December 2006 03:16, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > BUG: scheduling while atomic: hald-addon-stor/0x20000000/5078
> > [<c02b0289>] __sched_text_start+0x5f9/0xb00
> > [<c024a623>] net_rx_action+0xb3/0x180
> > [<c01210f2>] __do_softirq+0x72/0xe0
> > [<c0105205>] do_IRQ+0x45/0x80
>
> This doesn't seem to be related to libata at all. Like your
> first trace, you call schedule from a softirq context, which
> is always atomic.
> The only place where I can imagine this happening is the
> local_irq_enable() in there, which can be defined in different
> ways.
> Are you running with paravirt_ops, CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT
> and/or kernel preemption enabled?
This is set, although I don't recall setting it.
CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT=y
# CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE is not set
CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y
# CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set
CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL=y
Another odd thing I'm doing is simultaneously using a wired and
wireless net at the same time.
>
> Arnd <><
>
--
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@...il.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists