[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061228084251.GB3955@ucw.cz>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 08:42:52 +0000
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, maxk@...lcomm.com,
bluez-devel@...ts.sf.net
Subject: Re: bluetooth memory corruption (was Re: ext3-related crash in 2.6.20-rc1)
Hi!
> > > > I got this nasty oops while playing with debugger. Not sure if that is
> > > > related; it also might be something with bluetooth; I already know it
> > > > corrupts memory during suspend, perhaps it corrupts memory in some
> > > > error path?
> > >
> > > Okay, I spoke too soon. bluetooth & suspend memory corruption was
> > > _way_ harder to reproduce than expected. Took me 5-or-so-suspend
> > > cycles... so it is probably unrelated to the previous crash.
> >
> > can you try to reproduce this with 2.6.20-rc2 as well.
>
> (reproduced in another mail).
>
> _urb_queue_tail(__pending_q(husb, _urb->type), _urb);
> err = usb_submit_urb(urb, GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (err) {
> BT_ERR("%s tx submit failed urb %p type %d err %d",
> husb->hdev->name, urb, _urb->type, err);
> _urb_unlink(_urb);
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Do we need to remove urb from pending_q here?
>
> _urb_queue_tail(__completed_q(husb, _urb->type), _urb);
> } else
> atomic_inc(__pending_tx(husb, _urb->type));
>
Any news? Should I convert above idea to a patch? Or should I make
bluetooth suspend() routine return error so corruption is impossible
to hit?
Pavel
--
Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists