[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061228101311.GA9672@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 10:13:11 +0000
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
To: Gordon Farquharson <gordonfarquharson@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, ranma@...edrich.de,
tbm@...ius.com, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
andrei.popa@...eo.ro, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
hugh@...itas.com, nickpiggin@...oo.com.au, arjan@...radead.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix page_mkclean_one
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 10:20:20PM -0700, Gordon Farquharson wrote:
> I have run the program a few times, and the output is pretty
> consistent. However, when I increase the target size, the difference
> between the expected and actual values is larger.
>
> Written as (749)935(738)
> Chunk 1113 corrupted (1-1455) (2965-323)
> Expected 89, got 93
This is not the corruption Linus is after. Note that the corruption starts
at offset '1'. Also note that:
89 = 1113 & 255
93 = 1113 & 255 | (1113 >> 8)
and if you look at glibc's memset() function, you'll notice that's exactly
what you expect if you pass a non-8bit value to it. Ergo, what you're
seeing is utterly expected given glibc's memset() implementation on ARM.
Fixing Linus' test program to pass nr & 255 to memset results in clean
passes on 2.6.9 on TheCus N2100 (IOP8032x) and 2.6.16.9 StrongARM
machines (as would be expected.)
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists