linux-kernel - Re: [patch] remove MAX_ARG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 29 Dec 2006 20:49:04 +0000
From:	Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Ollie Wild <aaw@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	parisc-linux@...ts.parisc-linux.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@....de>,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [patch] remove MAX_ARG_PAGES

On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 09:03:57PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> FYI, i have forward ported your MAX_ARG_PAGES limit removal patch to 
> 2.6.20-rc2 and have included it in the -rt kernel. It's working great - 
> i can now finally do a "ls -t patches/*.patch" in my patch repository - 
> something i havent been able to do for years ;-)

How do the various autoconf stuff react to this?  Eg, I notice the
following in various configure scripts:

checking the maximum length of command line arguments... 32768

Suggest you test (eg) a rebuild of libX11 to see how it reacts to
this patch.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/