linux-kernel - Re: PROBLEM: setup apm as module version 2.4.34

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20061229220916.GN24090@1wt.eu>
Date:	Fri, 29 Dec 2006 23:09:16 +0100
From:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:	"Dr.-Ing. Ingo D. Rullhusen" <d01c@...-bremen.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: setup apm as module version 2.4.34

Hi,

On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 07:28:55PM +0100, Dr.-Ing. Ingo D. Rullhusen wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> i hope that's the right address for this little problem, which arises 
> with linux kernel 2.4.34.

Yes, it's the right address.

> If i compile the Advanced Power Management as module it do not work. If 
> i try a depmod i get an unresolved symbols message and so it cannot be 
> loaded of course.
> 
> But if the APM part is compiled into the kernel directly it works.
> 
> Simply disable the compile as module option?

I'm sorry, but could you be a bit more precise : config, error messages ?
Also, is this problem a regression (ie: did it work on a known previous
version, and if so, which one) ?

> Thanks
>   Ingo

Regards,
Willy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/