linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.20-rc2: known unfixed regressions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:51:06 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	vonbrand@....utfsm.cl
Cc:	bunk@...sta.de, torvalds@...l.org, akpm@...l.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc2: known unfixed regressions 

From: "Horst H. von Brand" <vonbrand@....utfsm.cl>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:36:02 -0300

> Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de> wrote:
> > This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc2 compared to 2.6.19.
> 
> Add that on SPARC64 boot fails due to missing /dev/root. Vanilla 2.6.19 and
> 2.6.19.1 work fine, before 2.6.20-rc1 it broke. I checked the initrds for
> both versions, the only difference "diff -Nur" finds between the unpacked
> initrds are the modules themselves (obviously).

Did you report this will all relevant details on sparclinux@...r
so that the sparc64 maintainers can analyze the problem?

I didn't see the report there else I would be looking into it.

Please don't report sparc64 bugs here, thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/