[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <4594BA09.1080509@odesys.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:47:37 -0800
From: Martin Stoilov <mstoilov@...sys.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: kobject_add unreachable code
The following code in kobject_add
if (!kobj->k_name)
kobj->k_name = kobj->name;
if (!kobj->k_name) {
pr_debug("kobject attempted to be registered with no name!\n");
WARN_ON(1);
return -EINVAL;
}
doesn't look right to me. The second 'if' statement looks useless after
the assignment in the first one. May be it was meant to be like:
if (!*kobj->k_name)
See the full patch:
--- linux-2.6.20-rc2/lib/kobject.c 2006-12-28 19:59:56.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.20-rc2.mod/lib/kobject.c 2006-12-28 20:00:25.000000000 -0800
@@ -161,19 +161,19 @@
int kobject_add(struct kobject * kobj)
{
int error = 0;
struct kobject * parent;
if (!(kobj = kobject_get(kobj)))
return -ENOENT;
if (!kobj->k_name)
kobj->k_name = kobj->name;
- if (!kobj->k_name) {
+ if (!*kobj->k_name) {
pr_debug("kobject attempted to be registered with no
name!\n");
WARN_ON(1);
return -EINVAL;
}
parent = kobject_get(kobj->parent);
-Martin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists