linux-kernel - Re: Want comments regarding patch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0612291106480.23545@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date:	Fri, 29 Dec 2006 11:13:07 +0100 (MET)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To:	Daniel Marjamäki <daniel.marjamaki@...il.com>
cc:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Want comments regarding patch


On Dec 29 2006 07:57, Daniel Marjamäki wrote:
>
> It was my goal to improve the readability. I failed.
>
> I personally prefer to use standard functions instead of writing code.
> In my opinion using standard functions means less code that is easier to read.

Hm in that case, what about having something like

void *memset_int(void *a, int x, int n) {
    asm("mov %0, %%esi;
         mov %1, %%eax;
         mov %2, %%ecx;
         repz movsd;",
       a,x,n);
}

in include/asm-i386/ and asm-x86_64/? (For x86_64, also a memset_long 
that uses rsi/rax/rcx/movsq)


	-`J'
--