[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200612302149.35752.vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 21:49:35 +0100
From: Denis Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
Cc: Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: replace "memset(...,0,PAGE_SIZE)" calls with "clear_page()"?
On Friday 29 December 2006 07:16, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> is there some reason there are so many calls of the form
>
> memset(addr, 0, PAGE_SIZE)
>
> rather than the apparently equivalent invocation of
>
> clear_page(addr)
>
> the majority of architectures appear to define the clear_page() macro
> in their include/<arch>/page.h header file, but not entirely
> identically, and in some cases that definition is conditional, as with
> i386:
>
> =============================================================
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_USE_3DNOW
> ...
> #define clear_page(page) mmx_clear_page((void *)(page))
> ...
> #else
> ...
> #define clear_page(page) memset((void *)(page), 0, PAGE_SIZE)
> ...
> #endif
> ============================================================
>
> should it perhaps be part of the CodingStyle doc to use the
> clear_page() macro rather than an explicit call to memset()? (and
> should all architectures be required to define that macro?)
clear_page assumes that given address is page aligned, I think.
It may fail if you feed it with misaligned region's address.
--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists