[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200612292201.24989.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 22:01:24 -0800
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nico@....org>
Cc: pHilipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Victor <andrew@...people.com>,
Bill Gatliff <bgat@...lgatliff.com>,
Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>, jamey.hicks@...com,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...sta.com>,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc1 5/6] SA1100 GPIO wrappers
On Friday 29 December 2006 7:15 pm, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, David Brownell wrote:
>
> > Here's a version that compiles ...
>
> This patch is completely broken.
It's just what Philipp sent, with the "won't compile" bugs fixed.
Oh, and some #include tweaks. Philipp?
> > Arch-neutral GPIO calls for PXA.
>
> This is not PXA but SA1100 to start with.
I seem to have copied the wrong header comment, sorry; the original
patch had none. It's marginally better than the header claiming it
was a PXA header...
> and you most probably need to protect the implied read-modify-write
> cycle with a spinlock unless the generic gpio API expects this
> protection is the responsibility of the caller.
No such lock is known to the caller. Some of those calls will need
to move to a C file somewhere.
- Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists