[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45961358.2010906@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 08:20:56 +0100
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...ightbb.com>
CC: Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@...e.fr>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [BUG 2.6.20-rc2] atkbd.c: Spurious ACK
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Somehow you get 2 ACks in a row, I wonder if on your boxes i8042
> pumps command and data into keyboard before i8042_interrupt gets a
> chance to run. Could you please apply the debug patch below and tell
> me the pattern of the data flow.
Yes, I believe the below trace confirms what you said? Both the ED and
the 00/05 are sent before the first ACK gets back, by a 1 jiffie margin:
drivers/input/serio/i8042.c: ed -> i8042 (panic blink) [N]
drivers/input/serio/i8042.c: 05 -> i8042 (panic blink) [N + 2]
drivers/input/serio/i8042.c: fa <- i8042 (interrupt, 0, 1) [N + 3]
drivers/input/serio/i8042.c: fa <- i8042 (interrupt, 0, 1) [N + 6]
drivers/input/serio/i8042.c: ed -> i8042 (panic blink) [M]
drivers/input/serio/i8042.c: 00 -> i8042 (panic blink) [M + 2]
drivers/input/serio/i8042.c: fa <- i8042 (interrupt, 0, 1) [M + 3]
drivers/input/serio/i8042.c: fa <- i8042 (interrupt, 0, 1) [M + 6]
The +2, +3 and +6 are constant. Forgot to pay attention to M - N, but I
suppose it's not too important.
For me, the patch as you posted it is actually good to go. No more
spurious ACK complaints...
Thanks,
Rene.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists