[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061229163316.020fcda1.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 16:33:16 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Cc: Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, nickpiggin@...oo.com.au,
kenneth.w.chen@...el.com, guichaz@...oo.fr, hugh@...itas.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ranma@...edrich.de, gordonfarquharson@...il.com,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, tbm@...ius.com, arjan@...radead.org,
andrei.popa@...eo.ro
Subject: Re: Ok, explained.. (was Re: [PATCH] mm: fix page_mkclean_one)
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 16:11:44 -0800 (PST)
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org> wrote:
>
>
> > JBD implements physical block-based journalling, so it is 100% appropriate
> > that JBD deal with these disk blocks using their buffer_head
> > representation.
>
> And as long as it does that, you just have to face the fact that it's
> going to perform like crap, including what you call "extra" writes, and
> what I call "deal with it".
It is quite tiresome to delete things which your interlocutor said and to
then restate them as if it were some sort of relevation.
> > Somewhat nastily, but as ext3 directories are metadata it is appropriate
> > that modifications to them be done in terms of buffer_heads (ie: blocks).
>
> No. There is nothing "appropriate" about using buffer_heads for metadata.
I said "modification".
> [stuff about directory reads elided]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists