linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] lock stat for -rt 2.6.20-rc2-rt2 [was Re: 2.6.19-rt14 slowdown compared to 2.6.19]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20061230193207.GA17882@gnuppy.monkey.org>
Date:	Sat, 30 Dec 2006 11:32:07 -0800
From:	Bill Huey (hui) <billh@...ppy.monkey.org>
To:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"Bill Huey (hui)" <billh@...ppy.monkey.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lock stat for -rt 2.6.20-rc2-rt2 [was Re: 2.6.19-rt14 slowdown compared to 2.6.19]

On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 06:56:08AM -0800, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-12-30 at 12:19 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > 
> >  - Documentation/CodingStyle compliance - the code is not ugly per se
> >    but still looks a bit 'alien' - please try to make it look Linuxish,
> >    if i apply this we'll probably stick with it forever. This is the
> >    major reason i havent applied it yet.
> 
> I did some cleanup while reviewing the patch, nothing very exciting but
> it's an attempt to bring it more into the "Linuxish" scope .. I didn't
> compile it so be warned.
> 
> There lots of ifdef'd code under CONFIG_LOCK_STAT inside rtmutex.c I
> suspect it would be a benefit to move that all into a header and ifdef
> only in the header .

Ingo and Daniel,

I'll try and make it more Linuxish. It's one of the reasons why I posted
it since I knew it would need some kind of help in that arena and I've
been in need of feedback regarding it. Originally, I picked a style that
made what I was doing extremely obvious and clear to facilitate
development which is the rationale behind it.

I'll make those changes and we can progressively pass it back and forth
to see if this passes.

bill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/