[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061230.211941.74748799.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 21:19:41 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: wmb@...mworks.com
Cc: devel@...top.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jg@...top.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Open Firmware device tree virtual filesystem
From: Mitch Bradley <wmb@...mworks.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 15:38:46 -1000
> Request for comments.
>
> This patch creates a virtual filesystem that represents an Open Firmware
> device tree. It has been tested on an OLPC x86 system, but the code is
> not processor-specific (apart from its current location under arch/i386).
>
> It requires an Open Firmware implementation that can stay resident during
> Linux startup.
>
> It is similar in some respect to fs/proc/proc_devtree.c , but does not
> use procfs, nor does it require an intermediate layer of code to
> create a flattened representation of the device tree.
>
> The patch applies cleanly against the current version of
> git://dev.laptop.org/olpc-2.6 . (commit 5b9429be6056864b938ff6f39e5df3cecbbfcf4b).
>
> Please cc me (Mitch Bradley <wmb@...mworks.com>) on comments.
Can we please not have N different interfaces to the open-firmware
calls so that perhaps powerpc and Sparc have a chance of using this
code too?
On sparc and powerpc, we even build an in-kernel data structure of the
entire open-firmware device tree that code like your's could use if
you make a simple setup layer for i386 as well. We have interfaces for
modifying property values at run time too.
I would strongly suggest looking at things like
arch/{sparc,sparc64,powerpc}/kernel/prom.c and
include/asm-{sparc,sparc64,powerpc}/prom.h and
arch/{sparc,sparc64,powerpc}/kernel/of_device.c and
include/asm-{sparc,sparc64,powerpc}/of_device.h
since we've already invested a lot of thought and
infrastructure into providing interfaces to this information
on powerpc and the two sparc platforms.
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists