[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070102115050.GA3449@ff.dom.local>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 12:50:50 +0100
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
To: Sid Boyce <sboyce@...eyonder.co.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.19 and up to 2.6.20-rc2 Ethernet problems x86_64
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 02:21:15AM +0000, Sid Boyce wrote:
> Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> >On 28-12-2006 04:23, Sid Boyce wrote:
> >>
> >>I first saw the problem on the 64x2 box after upgrading to 2.6.19. The
> >>network appeared OK with ifconfig and route -n, but I had no network
> >>access. Pinging any other box, the box was responding, but no response
> >...
> >>barrabas:/usr/src/linux-2.6.20-rc1-git5 # ssh Boycie ifconfig
> >>Password:
> >>eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0A:E4:4E:A1:42
> >> inet addr:192.168.10.5 Bcast:255.255.255.255
> >> Mask:255.255.255.0
> >
> >This Bcast isn't probably what you need.
> >
> >Regards,
> >Jarek P.
> >
> >
>
> Corrected on the one box where it was not correct, problem is still there.
There are many things to suspect yet:
- firewall,
- switch,
- routing,
- ifconfig,
- other misonfigured box,
- connecting
and so on.
I think you should try with some linux networking group
at first and if you really think it's driver then
netdev@...r.kernel.org (instead of linux-kernel@).
If you could send full ifconfig, route -n (or ip route
if you use additional tables) and tcpdump (all packets)
from both boxes while pinging each other and a few words
how it is connected (other cards, other active boxes in
the network?) maybe something more could be found.
Cheers,
Jarek P.
PS: Sorry for late responding.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists