[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070102132212.GA10522@coresystems.de>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 14:22:12 +0100
From: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@...esystems.de>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, devel@...top.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Open Firmware device tree virtual filesystem
* Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org> [070102 12:37]:
> Are you really suggesting that using a kernel copy of the
> device tree is the correct thing to do, and the only correct
> thing to do -- with the sole argument that "that's what the
> current ports do"?
There might also be a speed advantage if any drivers or user space
programs operate heavily on the device tree on those systems with _lots_
of devices..
Stefan
--
coresystems GmbH • Brahmsstr. 16 • D-79104 Freiburg i. Br.
Tel.: +49 761 7668825 • Fax: +49 761 7664613
Email: info@...esystems.de • http://www.coresystems.de/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists