[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070102142627.GA14954@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 14:26:27 +0000
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, linux-aio@...ck.org,
akpm@...l.org, drepper@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jakub@...hat.com, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [FSAIO][PATCH 6/8] Enable asynchronous wait page and lock page
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 08:17:17PM +0530, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote:
> I am really bad with names :( I tried using the _wq suffixes earlier and
> that seemed confusing to some, but if no one else objects I'm happy to use
> that. I thought aio_lock_page() might be misleading because it is
> synchronous if a regular wait queue entry is passed in, but again it may not
> be too bad.
>
> What's your preference ? Does anything more intuitive come to mind ?
Beein bad about naming seems to be a disease, at least I suffer from it
aswell. I wouldn't mind either the _wq or aio_ naming - _wq describes
the way it's called and aio_ describes it's a special case for aio.
Similarly to how ->aio_read/->aio_write can be used for synchronous I/O
aswell.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists