linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.20-rc2+: CFQ halving disk throughput.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <459A73CB.8010901@rtr.ca>
Date:	Tue, 02 Jan 2007 10:01:31 -0500
From:	Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>
To:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc:	Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>, Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc2+: CFQ halving disk throughput.

Jens Axboe wrote:
>
>> But surely one of (not sure which) sync+async or async+sync may also be 
>> okay?
>> Or would it?
> 
> Async merge to sync request should be ok. But I wonder what happens with
> hdparm, since it seems to trigger one of these tests. Very puzzling.
> I'll dive in and take a look.

The code (written 10 years ago) isn't the best in the world,
and will be redone entirely for hdparm-7.0 this year.

But right now, it essentially does this:

loop:
	seek( to sector zero );
	read( 2MBytes );
	repeat loop for 3 seconds

Cheers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/