[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <459A9C30.20204@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 02:53:52 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To: Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>
CC: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc2+: CFQ halving disk throughput.
Mark Lord wrote:
> Tejun Heo wrote:
>>
>> OT but care to make -i and -I work equivalently? Such that -i reports
>> more detailed info and user can dump stored id block.
>
> hdparm -I works just fine now.
No objection there.
> hdparm -i requires the HDIO_GET_IDENTITY ioctl() from drivers/ide,
> to retrieve the "boot time" copy of the identify block, before any
> mods are made by the driver. But in recent years, drivers/ide has
> broken it, in that it tries to maintain the "boot time" copy in sync
> with the on-drive copy. Kinda makes -i pointless.
>
> Is there a way to retrieve the libata cached copy of the ID block?
> How?
Just implemented and posted patch for HDIO_GET_IDENTITY in an attempt to
access ATAPI IDENTIFY block using hdparm.
>> Support for IDENTIFY PACKET DEVICE would be nice too.
>
> It already does that, using HDIO_DRIVE_CMD to retrieve it
> in the same way as for regular IDENTIFY DEVICE commands.
Hmmm... My hdparm doesn't seem to do that.
# hdparm -V
hdparm v6.9
# hdparm -I /dev/sr0
/dev/sr0:
HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(identify) failed: Input/output error
Am I missing something?
> In hdparm-7.0, I'll have it use ATA passthrough when possible
> for most/all commands.
Glad to hear.
Happy new year.
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists