[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200701021342.32195.lenb@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 13:42:32 -0500
From: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To: Ken Moffat <zarniwhoop@...world.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: x86 instability with 2.6.1{8,9}
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 13:04, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 12:25:57PM -0500, Len Brown wrote:
> > > it's been nothing but trouble in 32-bit mode.
> > > It still works fine when I boot it in 64-bit mode.
> >
> > A shot in the dark at the spontaneous reset issue, but no clue on the 32 vs 64-bit observation...
> >
> > See if ACPI exports any temperature readings under /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/*/temperature
> > and if so, keep an eye on them to see if there is an indication of a thermal problem.
> >
> > ( And if ACPI doesn't, maybe lmsensors can find something.)
> >
> > cheers,
> > -Len
>
> Thanks, but there is nothing there. I never managed to get
> lmsensors configured (as in 'calibrated') for the hardware I tried it
> on, but I was starting to think about retrying it. But first, I'm
> just about to start testing with memtest86+ in case something in the
> memory has gone bad.
You might remove and re-insert the DIMMS.
Sometimes there are poor contacts if the DIMMS are not fully seated and clicked in.
The real mystery is the 32 vs 64-bit thing.
Are the devices configured the same way -- ie are they both in IOAPIC mode
and /proc/interrupts looks the same for both modes?
-Len
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists