linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] slab: cache alloc cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <84144f020701021227x17c4b866ne39ebe4501afece6@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 2 Jan 2007 22:27:19 +0200
From:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	"Christoph Lameter" <clameter@....com>
Cc:	akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, apw@...dowen.org,
	hch@....de, manfred@...orfullife.com, christoph@...eter.com,
	pj@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab: cache alloc cleanups

On Tue, 2 Jan 2007, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> > +
> > +     if (nodeid == -1 || nodeid == numa_node_id()) {
> > +             if (unlikely(current->flags & (PF_SPREAD_SLAB | PF_MEMPOLICY))) {
> > +                     obj = alternate_node_alloc(cache, flags);
> > +                     if (obj)
> > +                             goto out;
> > +             }

On 1/2/07, Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> wrote:
> This reintroduces a bug that was fixed a while ago.

Aah, well, we could have a can_mempolicy parameter, but I'm not sure
if it's an improvement to the current version still...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/