linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Open Firmware device tree virtual filesystem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1167710167.6165.21.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Tue, 02 Jan 2007 14:56:07 +1100
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	David Kahn <dmk@...x.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, wmb@...mworks.com,
	devel@...top.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jg@...top.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Open Firmware device tree virtual filesystem

> This is a trivial implementation that suits it's purpose.
> It's simple. I'm not sure what more is needed for this
> project when it's pretty clear that i386 will never need
> any additional support for open firmware.

I don't agree. It's definitely not clear to me.... Especially as open
source OF implementations are starting to show up, it makes a lot of
sense to start representing non-enumerable devices (CPUs, legacy
devices, embedded things etc...) in the device-tree and I fail to see
why an x86 OF-based machine would not get the ability to use it in the
same way as powerpc or sparc does in that regard.

Ben.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/