lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0701021421290.2074@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Tue, 2 Jan 2007 14:33:08 -0800 (PST)
From:	Hua Zhong <hzhong@...il.com>
To:	fengguang.wu@...il.com, akpm@...l.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, johnstul@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [BUG 2.6.20-rc2-mm1] init segfaults whenCONFIG_PROFILE_LIKELY=y


I am wondering if we should define __likely/__unlikely macros no matter whether
CONFIG_LIKELY_PROFILE is defined, like the following. This way people can always
use the raw macros in case the debugging version causes problems.

Signed-off-by: Hua Zhong <hzhong@...il.com>

--- linux-2.6/include/linux/compiler.h.orig	2007-01-02 13:51:32.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/compiler.h	2007-01-02 14:18:33.000000000 -0800
@@ -53,6 +53,9 @@
 # include <linux/compiler-intel.h>
 #endif
 
+#define __likely(x)	__builtin_expect(!!(x), 1)
+#define __unlikely(x)	__builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
+
 #if defined(CONFIG_PROFILE_LIKELY) && !(defined(CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD) && defined(MODULE))
 struct likeliness {
 	const char *func;
@@ -93,8 +96,8 @@
  * specific implementations come from the above header files
  */
 
-#define likely(x)	__builtin_expect(!!(x), 1)
-#define unlikely(x)	__builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
+#define likely(x)	__likely(x)
+#define unlikely(x)	__unlikely(x)
 #endif
 
 /* Optimization barrier */
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ