[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070102043743.GB15718@thunk.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 23:37:43 -0500
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Print sysrq-m messages with KERN_INFO priority
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 08:42:47PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 22:24:53 -0500
> "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu> wrote:
>
> > Print messages resulting from sysrq-m with a KERN_INFO instead of the
> > default KERN_WARNING priority
>
> hm, I wonder why. If someone does sysrq-<whatever> then they presumably want
> to display the result? Tricky.
>
> Is this patch a consistency thing?
The goal of the patch was to avoid filling /var/log/messages huge
amounts of sysrq text. Some of the sysrq commands, especially sysrq-m
and sysrq-t emit a truly vast amount of information, and it's not
really nice to have that filling up /var/log/messages.
- Ted
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists