[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070101.210108.41636312.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2007 21:01:08 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: benh@...nel.crashing.org
Cc: segher@...nel.crashing.org, hch@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...top.org, dmk@...x.com,
wmb@...mworks.com, jg@...top.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Open Firmware device tree virtual filesystem
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 15:57:05 +1100
> I like being able to have a simple way (ie. tar /proc/device-tree) to
> tell user to send me their DT and have in the end an exact binary
> representation so I can actually dig for problems, like a wrong phandle
> in an interrupt-map or stuff like that...
"prtconf -pv" is what I'd ask the user to do on Sparc, or something
similar.
In over 10 years of the sparc port there's never been a situation
where "prtconf -pv" or similar did not get me the information I
needed. :-)
"prtconf" walks the device tree raw using /dev/openprom and
pretty prints it like I assume your ppc "lsprop" thing does.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists