linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.20-rc2+: CFQ halving disk throughput.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 2 Jan 2007 09:44:47 +0100
From:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc:	Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>, Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...e.de>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc2+: CFQ halving disk throughput.

On Mon, Jan 01 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 23:46:58 +0100
> Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > > Everything seems fine in the dmesg.  Performance degradation is
> > > probably some other issue in -rc kernel.  I'm suspecting recently
> > > fixed block layer bug.  If it's still the same in the next -rc,
> > > please report.
> > 
> > In fact, it's CFQ. The PATA thing was a red herring. 2.6.20-rc2 and 3 
> > give me ~ 24 MB/s from "hdparm t /dev/hda" while 2.6.20-rc1 and below 
> > give me ~ 50 MB/s.
> > 
> > Jens: this is due to "[PATCH] cfq-iosched: tighten allow merge 
> > criteria", 719d34027e1a186e46a3952e8a24bf91ecc33837:
> > 
> > http://www2.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=719d34027e1a186e46a3952e8a24bf91ecc33837
> > 
> > If I revert that one, I have my 50 M/s back. config and dmesg attached 
> > in case they're useful.
> 
> The patch would appear to need this fix:
> 
> --- a/block/cfq-iosched.c~a
> +++ a/block/cfq-iosched.c
> @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ static int cfq_allow_merge(request_queue
>  	if (cfqq == RQ_CFQQ(rq))
>  		return 1;
>  
> -	return 1;
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static inline void
> _
> 
> But that might not fix things...

Yeah it is, but I don't think it'll fix it (if anything, it'll be more
conservative).

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/