| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20070102104017.4d11eedf@localhost.localdomain> Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 10:40:17 +0000 From: Alan <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> To: "Trent Waddington" <trent.waddington@...il.com> Cc: "Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu" <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>, "Bernd Petrovitsch" <bernd@...mix.at>, "Erik Mouw" <erik@...ddisk-recovery.com>, "Giuseppe Bilotta" <bilotta78@...pop.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Open letter to Linux kernel developers (was Re: Binary Drivers) > I think you're repeating a myth that has become a common part of > hacker lore in recent years. It's caused by how little we know about > software patents. The myth is that if you release source code which > violates someone's patent that is somehow worse than if you release > binaries that violate someone's patent. This is clearly, obviously, > false. If you're practising the invention without a license in your > source code then you're practising the invention without a license in > binaries compiled from that source code. Period. You are forgetting the 11th commandment - thou shalt not get caught. Most software patents (actually quite probably most patents) are held by people who don't have the skills to go disassembling megabytes of code in search of offenders. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists