[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070102111256.GA27541@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 12:12:56 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
Cc: kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...l.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Improve interrupt response
* Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com> wrote:
> From: Dor Laor <dor.laor@...ranet.com>
>
> The current interrupt injection mechanism might delay an interrupt
> under the following circumstances:
>
> - if injection fails because the guest is not interruptible (rflags.IF clear,
> or after a 'mov ss' or 'sti' instruction). Userspace can check rflags,
> but the other cases or not testable under the current API.
> - if injection fails because of a fault during delivery. This probably
> never happens under normal guests.
> - if injection fails due to a physical interrupt causing a vmexit so that
> it can be handled by the host.
>
> in all cases the guest proceeds without processing the interrupt,
> reducing the interactive feel and interrupt throughput of the guest.
>
> This patch fixes the situation by allowing userspace to request an
> exit when the 'interrupt window' opens, so that it can re-inject the
> interrupt at the right time. Guest interactivity is very visibly
> improved.
Andrew, i'd argue for this to be included in v2.6.20, because it's an
obvious bugfix. I've tested this patch and it's included in current -rt
and i saw no regressions.
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists