linux-kernel - Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled eepro100 removal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <459B731A.301@web.de>
Date:	Wed, 03 Jan 2007 10:10:50 +0100
From:	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
CC:	jgarzik@...ox.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, saw@....sw.com.sg,
	Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled eepro100 removal

Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This patch contains the scheduled removal of the eepro100 driver.
> 

I'm sorry to disturb the schedule, but I'm not sure right now if this
pending issue of the e100 was meanwhile solved or declared a non-issue:

http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/9/8/105

Auke, can you confirm that it makes sense to re-test? IIRC, our private
thread ended without resolution after I discovered that the chip
revision makes the difference for me. Looked like it is either handled
incorrectly by e100 or screwed up on that board.

Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/