linux-kernel - Re: Alternative msync() fix for 2.6.18?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1167834727.3798.6.camel@xenpc.internal.licquia.org>
Date:	Wed, 03 Jan 2007 09:32:07 -0500
From:	Jeff Licquia <licquia@...ian.org>
To:	Martin Michlmayr <tbm@...ius.com>
Cc:	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	394392@...s.debian.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: Alternative msync() fix for 2.6.18?

On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 15:01 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Yes, I agree.  I'm CCing the linux-mm list in hope that someone can
> review your patch.  In the meantime, I've asked the Debian LSB folks to
> verify that your patch fixes the LSB problem.

I am running the complete lsb-runtime-test suite against the new kernels
(as installed yesterday from the sid apt repo at
http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net/debian-kernel), but I also did a
run with just the msync test, which passed.  I will report the results
for the full suite when they become available.

FWIW, here's uname:

Linux xenpc 2.6.18-4-xen-686 #1 SMP Mon Jan 1 02:33:53 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/