linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 01/13] Linux RDMA Core Changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1167836762.4187.15.camel@stevo-desktop>
Date:	Wed, 03 Jan 2007 09:06:02 -0600
From:	Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...lanox.co.il>
Cc:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, openib-general@...nib.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH  v4 01/13] Linux RDMA Core Changes

On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 17:02 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > I've run this code with mthca and didn't notice any performance
> > degradation, but I wasn't specifically measuring cq_poll overhead in a
> > tight loop...
> 
> We were speaking about ib_req_notify_cq here, actually, not cq poll.
> So what was tested?
> 

Sorry, I meant req_notify.  I didn't specifically measure the cost of
req_notify before and after this change.

I've been running the user mode perftest programs mainly.  



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/